Tag Archives: Highway History

Putting Preservation on the Road: Protecting Our Overlooked Automotive Heritage in the Twenty-first Century …

Putting Preservation on the Road: Protecting Our Overlooked Automotive Heritage in the Twenty-first Century

 

Date:  October 20-22, 2016

Location: Historic Vehicle Association Research Laboratory, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA

The Historic Vehicle Association (HVA) and the Historic Preservation & Community Planning Program at the College of Charleston are pleased to announce the following call for papers for an international conference on the preservation of automotive heritage.

https://networks.h-net.org/node/15531/discussions/111513/putting-preservation-road-protecting-our-overlooked-automotive

For much of the twentieth century heritage preservation primarily focused on sedentary objects (i.e., 1906 Antiquities Act in the United States, 1919 Historic Sites and Monuments Board in Canada, etc.). While some countries have studied and documented vehicles for preservation and/or conservation, their official recognition as landmarks or on registers of official distinction has largely been overlooked. This is most apparent within the field of automotive heritage. For example, within the United States there are over 90,000 separate listings for buildings, sites, structures, districts, and other objects on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Vehicles on the NRHP include historic ships, railroad locomotives and streetcars, equipment related to the space age, and so forth – but not a single automobile or similar vehicle related to this form of transportation. This is also the case for the approximate 12,500 sites on the Canadian Register of Historic Places. Individual automotive vehicles by themselves are not listed as contributing elements – just the stationary buildings and sites. Considering that there is a precedent for both, such as moving ships and trains as well as stationary buildings and places on automotive heritage, the question becomes “why not automobiles?” Hence the newly-created National Historic Vehicle Register (NHVR), which can be used as a tool to carefully and accurately document the most historically significant automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, and commercial vehicles, as well as recognize the dynamic relationship between people, culture, and their means of transportation. The NHVR was developed by the Historic Vehicle Association (HVA) in partnership with the U.S. Department of the Interior in March 2013 to explore how vehicles important to American and automotive history could be effectively documented. Using Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) standards, this project is the first of its type to create a permanent archive of significant historic automobiles within the Library of Congress (see https://historicvehicle.org/national-historic-vehicle-register/).

The issue of overlooking historic vehicle preservation becomes further exasperated when we consider that none of the accredited programs in historic preservation and heritage conservation (more than sixty with the National Council of Preservation Education, a dozen with the National Roundtable of Heritage Education, among others in various countries) offer permanent coursework on the subject, let alone any other form of training or directed study. This is significant when we consider how much of our global economy, landscape, built environment, culture, and way of life across the world has been affected by the automobile. The NHVR is an important starting point in our efforts to study the role of automobiles in the formation of our cultural landscapes, but there is much work that must follow. Automobiles have been designed no less than buildings or furniture to engage with broader cultural phenomena, to answer – and indeed to inspire – human needs and desires that are inseparably intertwined with time and place.  Furthermore, cars have been interpreted and re-interpreted by human beings in complex ways that often go beyond the intentions of their designers; they are cultural products not only of broad and powerful impact, but also of great complexity, and as such they must be contextualized in historical research if they are to be understood. Just because automobiles move should not be the disqualifying reason for not studying them. Indeed, we have lost much of our automotive heritage due to this lack of awareness, especially when considering that in the United States alone, prior to 1930, there were over 2,600 different automotive manufacturers. Today we are left primarily with the “Big Three” and a handful of minor manufactures. Not all pre-1930 companies were based in traditional places of manufacture Michigan, Bavaria (Germany), or Turin (Italy). For instance, South Carolina had its own independent companies, such as Anderson, during the 1910s and 1920s. Other countries too, whom we don’t normally think of as having their own homegrown auto industry, at one time did. Among these are the nearly forgotten Canadian manufactures Derby, Gray-Dort Motors, and Russell Motor Car Company. This local and regional heritage has largely been forgotten.

Suggested presentation topics may include, but are not limited to:

  • Case studies of regional and local automotive culture and heritage, including those viewed through the lens of ethnic/regional studies (American studies, Canadian studies, material culture studies, studies of nomadic peoples, etc.)
  • Considering if there is a world automotive heritage, whether UNESCO or ICOMOS should be encouraged to get involved, and the role of FIVA (Fédération Internationale des Véhicules Anciens) as part of this.
  • Innovative ways to add the preservation of automotive heritage to the educational curriculum within colleges/universities, high schools, and technology schools.
  • Make better known the NHVR as an appropriate alternative to the NRHP for cars, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles: If “this place matters”, then by extension, there is the argument that “this car matters” too.
  • Using HAER/HABS techniques for studying and documenting historic vehicles, as well as exploring innovative techniques and tools through the use of new technologies
  • Reevaluating listed historic places and sites, as well as considering new places where buildings and landscapes (etc.) are tied with vehicles and people, in a more comprehensive designation that ties together the NHVR and NRHP, where both building/structure and car/vehicle elements are equally contributing.
  • Case studies of best practices related to preservation, conservation, restoration, adaptive reuse, and reconstruction of automobiles and associated material culture.
  • Recognizing important designers of automobiles in the same manner as architects.
  • Vernacular automotive design and use vs. haute design and auto racing preservation, in order to better understand the cultural meaning of vehicles for ordinary people in their everyday lives.
  • The approaches of allied fields in the preservation of automotive heritage, such as public history, archaeology, museum studies, cultural resource management, design/architectural history, etc.
  • Automobility and the environment, such as the rehabilitation of historic automobiles, and its relationships with energy efficiency, embodied energy and so forth in transportation (“is the greenest car one that has already been built?”)
  • Establishing standards for the proper treatment of historic vehicles so as to define what is appropriate preservation, rehabilitation and restoration. This can include the U.S. Secretary of the Interior, as well as the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation in Canada, among others, as well as qualification standards for the people who work on them. The Turin Charter (2012) can serve as a template for such standards in a similar way to the Athens (1933) and Venice (1964) charters do for buildings.
  • Preserving historic vehicle trades, maintenance and materials to prevent them from becoming a dying vocation through the preservation of automobiles in a manner similar to building trades professions. The way we once built and maintained cars is a fading practice, akin to traditional building trades (carpentry, plastering, etc.), especially when you consider that it is now standard for cars to no longer have an oil dipstick, let alone other DIY maintenance accessories.
  • Analyzing the contributions of automotive preservation heritage events, auto shows, museums, etc. to the economy and tourism – information that is not always fully included in Main Street programs and other economic development initiatives related to preservation planning.

 

Swansea Bus Museum under threat …

New Year message from our Chairman:

First of all I wish you a very Happy New Year! May 2016 look favourably on us all!

2016 is a make or break year for us. As you may be aware, our lease expires at the end of this year and we have been notified that it is highly unlikely to be renewed under the same favourable terms. Our building sits within the SA1 Local Development Area, which is set to evolve rapidly following the opening of the new Swansea University campus last September. It’s only a matter of time before our former industrial site will be consumed for residential and/or leisure use. In the short term, increased occupancy of adjacent units has pushed up rents.

You may recall that we carried out a business planning exercise with Landsker Business Solutions Ltd. in 2014. Key to the execution of the plan ls the securing of our own property, either through direct ownership or a very long term lease. Such an arrangement will make it easier for us to obtain grant funding, something we have had only limited success with so far. Our present site arrangement does not fit the criteria to achieve this.

We’re presently investigating several alternative sites in the Swansea Bay area and will place renewed urgency on the situation now that Christmas is behind us. In the meantime, you may have noticed that the museum is currently closed to the general public. This is due to a major housekeeping exercise underway in the spares area at the far corner of the museum in preparation for the move. The need to create space to work in that area has meant that some vehicles have needed to be moved into the public display area, restricting movement there. For public safety reasons the trustees decided on the closure during this quiet time of year. The museum will reopen to the public for the Swansea Historic Vehicle Autojumble on Sunday February 21st , when our vehicles will be on display outside, before our own Running Day on the following Sunday, February 28th.

I’m making a heartfelt appeal for as much assistance as possible from members and volunteers on Sundays during this “down” time. The future success of the museum depends on all of us, while failure will see the break-up of the collection and the likely loss of many historic vehicles to the scrap man, something we have worked hard to avoid over the years. We really need to be pulling together now!

To this end I request that as many of you as possible attend the next monthly members’ meeting at the museum on Sunday January 10th at 11am.

I trust that I can count on your continuing support at this crucial time.

Alan West
Chairman, Swansea Bus Museum
www.swtpg.org.uk

Robot buses lead way to turn science fiction into reality …

The Times, 29 December 2015, Elizabeth Rigby and Nic Fildes

Robot buses in rural communities, satellite navigation systems to help shoppers find available parking spaces and virtual reality sets to beam Nobel prize winners into classrooms could become reality, according to Whitehall.

The ideas are being drawn up as part of a five-year digital strategy to ensure that the government is not left behind in the digital revolution.

Ministers from every department will be asked to come up with policies for education, transport and healthcare, as David Cameron establishes new digital ambitions for the remainder of this parliament. “This is cross-government,” one Whitehall official said. “It is about how we push the boundaries and make sure every bit of government is digital and policy is more digital.”

The strategy reinforces the government’s efforts to boost the digital economy, which began in 2010 when Mr Cameron launched the “Tech City” initiative to promote the cluster of high-tech businesses around Shoreditch in east London.

Latest official figures show that the digital sector accounted for 7.5 per cent of the economy, or £113 billion, in 2013, putting Britain marginally ahead of Germany.

The digital economy is also outpacing other sectors, growing seven times faster than the wider economy between 2008 and 2013. “From driverless cars to deliveries by drone — the future imagined by far-fetched science fiction films from only a few years ago is rapidly coming true,” Ed Vaizey, the digital minister, told The Times.

“New technologies are changing every aspect of our lives. We need to make sure that wherever government is involved — as the service provider, regulator or a major buyer — we are making the most of it.”

Mr Vaizey said that the government intended to develop more open online courses in schools so that leading educators could be beamed into classrooms.

The NHS will also be asked to develop and use technology to predict illnesses and to take pre-emptive action. “A patient might have a wearable monitor — a FitBit [activity tracker] for example — which monitors their vitals; real-time data might pick up a risk of diabetes, and preventative action is taken,” one official explained.

Ministers will also try to realise the promise of a smartphone state by making it easier for people to fill in tax returns and renew driving licences. “Government services need to be as good as the best consumer services,” Mr Vaizey said. “Renewing your passport should be as easy as buying a book online.”

The government’s plans for a fully fledged digital economy have been hampered by the debate about the quality of broadband and mobile networks.

People in rural areas have become frustrated that the services envisaged by the government will not be available to them, given the lack of improvement in broadband speeds.

The government has set out an ambition to connect all citizens to a minimum speed of 10Mbps by 2020, but telecoms companies say that promises to speed up improvements to the networks, by reforming the rules governing mast installation, have not come to fruition.

Mr Vaizey said that the government remained on track to provide superfast broadband to 95 per cent of the country by the end of 2017, adding that it was crucial that Whitehall embraced the next phase of the digital revolution.

The deadline for submissions for the government strategy paper is January 19, with the document set to be published by the spring.

Go-Ahead on the road to Singapore with bus deal …

The Times, 24 November 2015, Robert Lea

The Singaporean invasion of the British passenger transport market has been partially reversed, with Go-Ahead Group announcing a £230 million, five-year contract to run buses in the Asian city-state. Its contract covering the Loyang district is the first foray in the Singapore market by a British bus and train group.

David Brown, Go-Ahead’s chief executive, said that the group had pushed its status as London’s largest bus operator during the bidding. “We have a strong track record of providing passenger transport in busy urban areas,” he said.

In recent years, the flow of deal traffic has been largely in the opposite direction. Metroline, for example, one of London’s largest bus companies, is owned by ComfortDelGro, a Singapore-listed group that also runs Armchair and Westbus coach operations in the southeast and CityLink in Scotland, plus taxi operations in several cities.

Shares in Go-Ahead dipped 20p, or 0.8 per cent, to £25.73.

It’s grim up north for FirstGroup …

The Times, 10 December 2015, Alistair Osborne: Business commentary

Tourists are always asking: can you direct us to the Northern Powerhouse? And the honest answer is no chance, mate — and not just because it’s north of Watford. It’s because it’s a figment of the chancellor’s imagination.

So, how nice to see one of George Osborne’s cabinet colleagues admitting as much with his award of two rail franchises: one to a state-owned German outfit, dressed up as Arriva, the other to FirstGroup. The pair are ready to deliver “a world class rail service that would make the Northern Powerhouse a reality”. Or so said transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin, immediately dispatching a junior minister, Andrew Jones, up north to unfurl a Northern Powerhouse banner — before putting it back in his bag.

There you have it, then. The whole powerhouse thing’s basically a flag. So it’s dead lucky everyone was so distracted by the shock of FirstGroup actually winning a rail franchise: TransPennine Express. True, winning slightly overstates things, what with the transport group having run it already for 11 years. But at least it’s not another loss, the main forte lately of chief executive Tim O’Toole, who lost Thameslink, ScotRail and the Caledonian sleeper while failing to replace them with the East Coast or vomit comet (Essex Thameside).

Astonishingly, it’s First’s first win since 2012’s West Coast bid fiasco — and now, instead of getting a subsidy to run TransPennine, it’ll have to make £400 million of premium payments and invest £500 million by 2023. That will produce the new trains to increase capacity by 55 per cent between the likes of Manchester, Leeds and Sheffield — enough, First reckons, to maintain the pace of passenger growth, up from 13 million to 28 million since 2004. Better, First won’t have to share profits with its former partner, France’s Keolis, which switched sides to bid with Go-Ahead and lost.

Anyway, it was enough to lift First shares 1 per cent to nearly 104¼p, still a bit below the 119p ex-rights price where the group raised £615 million in 2013. But at least First had a better day than rival Stagecoach, which lost the TransPennine bid, pulled out of the one for East Anglia and tried to blame Isis for its rubbish figures, so getting a deserved 14 per cent share price spanking.

As for Mr Osborne’s pet project, think-tank IPPR North reckons “between £15 billion and £65 billion is required to transform the north’s transport infrastructure”. What’s a gap of £50 billion, except, of course, lots of Northern Powerhouse flags.

Research enquiry – Hindustan Motors and Morris Motors

Dear RRTHA members,

I am currently engaging on research for a postdoctoral project on the history of India’s automotive industry since the 1940s. One of my interests is in the collaboration between Hindustan Motors and Morris Motors roughly since the time of the Second World War. The production of the Ambassador car, which was modelled on an earlier Morris car, has only just ceased in 2014.

I think I have found a number of relevant material on this cooperation, but I would like to dig some further and uncover new documentation which could also bring up new perspectives on this cooperation.

My question is whether members of your association know more about the Morris company and its interests in the Indian market. Where could I find more information on this specific connection to India? Are there any publication by Morris on India or its cooperation partner? I would be very grateful if you could let me know.

I am currently in India, but will be doing research in UK over the next year for longer periods.

With best wishes from New Delhi,

Stefan Tetzlaff
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Centre for Indian and South Asian Studies (CEIAS)

EHESS-CNRS, Paris, France

 

Stefan Tetzlaff
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Centre for Indian and South Asian Studies (CEIAS)
EHESS-CNRS, Paris, France
+91 728 999 7706

de.linkedin.com/in/stefantetzlaff

Affiliated Research Fellow
Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), New Delhi
Centre for Studies in Social Sciences (CSSS), Kolkata

Uber’s domination ends the Knowledge as we know it …

Uber claimed its latest victim after London’s largest school for black cab drivers said that it would close its doors next month.

Malcolm Linskey, 70, who established Knowledge Point in Islington, north London, 30 years ago, said that the twin pressures of Uber and increased property prices had led him to believe that “we’re going to be brushed aside”.

To gain a licence, London cabbies must study “the Knowledge”, quite literally learning the ins and outs of 25,000 streets in the capital.

Mr Linskey said that the diminishing demand for knowledge courses was responsible for his school’s demise. “Demand has gone down since Uber arrived. Usually we have 350 students enrolling a year, last year it was 200.”

He said that his company would continue to produce and sell taxi driver training materials in print and online, supplemented by training sessions in church halls and community centres

Uber, which started in San Francisco, has been the focus of protests around the world, with Parisian taxi drivers even attacking their rivals.

Black cab drivers, unhappy with what they perceive as unfair competition from unregulated “ehailing” apps, have also taken their anger to the streets. In May many caused gridlock during a protest in central London.

Car industry reveals a clutch of big new ideas for the future …

The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders has chosen its shortlist for the annual award for automotive innovation in Britain.

Only too aware of the perils of creating the wrong kind of new idea as the Volkswagen emissions crisis rumbles on, the five contenders for this year’s award, sponsored by GKN and supported by The Times, show Britain competing at the forefront of automotive trends and thinking.

Projects cover the electric and driverless vehicles of the future and deal with the central issue of carbon reduction. They translate to how companies can “manufacture smarter” and, at the other end of the spectrum, how they can “sell smarter”.

The ideas, and their research and development, also show the diversity of where the industry is generating its ideas — from big brains spinning out of Oxford University to gaming software geniuses, and from specialist consultancies to small manufacturers and in-house engineers all charged with solving difficult problems.

Recent winners of this award have shown how British companies have transformed bus transportation, using Formula One motor racing flywheel technology or converting buses to run wholly on electric. There also has been recognition of Ford’s global research centre in Essex creating its company’s greenest internal combustion engine yet and Jaguar Land Rover’s plans to move to plug-in hybrids.

Mike Hawes, chief executive of the SMMT, said: “This year’s entries prove that innovation comes in all shapes and sizes.

“Whether it’s a new type of glue for bonding tricky materials or a 12-tonne truck, any concept that has the potential to radically improve the industry should be supported and celebrated. The 2015 judging panel has its work cut out. Choosing a winner will not be easy.”

Crash and burn: a history of car industry cock-ups and cover-ups …

The Sunday Times, 27 September 2015

Ford Pintos were sold despite having a fatal flaw Ford Pintos were sold despite having a fatal flaw

THE car industry is no stranger to scandal, but periodically one erupts that rises above the usual level of corporate misdemeanour and ignites the public imagination in a way that other consumer controversies do not.

Perhaps it is because the consequences of the faults are so grave. Or perhaps it is that, because of our love affair with cars, we feel betrayed on a personal level. Volkswagen has had more than its fair share, and not all of them about cars. Riven by corporate strife, it was also tarnished in 2005 by a good old-fashioned red-top tale of bribery, corruption and sex. It emerged that Peter Hartz, the company’s head of personnel, had authorised large payments to union officials to buy their support, as well as lavish trips and visits to prostitutes. The latest furore over emissions tests could prove the most serious, with the threat of criminal charges against those responsible for cheating American clean-air regulations.

What most car industry scandals have in common is that it is not the crime but the cover-up that has resulted in the real outrage.

Ford’s inflammable Pinto

Perhaps the most cynical safety-related scandal to date, the Ford Pinto affair has become shorthand for corporate immorality. When the Pinto appeared in showrooms in 1971, Ford knew it had a potentially fatal flaw. If the car was hit from behind, the differential could puncture the fuel tank, leading to petrol spraying into the passenger compartment and then igniting.

Ford decided it would sell the Pinto anyway, without modifications. Then in 1973 a memo from one of Ford’s accountants was leaked to the press, and it proved even more explosive than the car itself. Ford had worked out how much it would cost to re-engineer the car to make it safe; then it had calculated how many people were likely to be burnt to death in their cars. It put a figure on how much each of the resulting lawsuits would cost the company and decided it would be cheaper to pay the lawsuits than to fix the problem.

It took until 1978 for Ford to recall the Pinto (along with the identical Mercury Bobcat), from its 1.5m owners to make the necessary modifications. Ford ended up paying out hundreds of millions of dollars in lawsuits.

Takata was criticised during a US Senate hearingTakata was criticised during a US Senate hearing (Tom Williams)

Takata’s exploding airbags

Airbags are meant to save people, not kill them, so when it became apparent in 2008 that car occupants were dying as a result of airbags exploding, something was clearly amiss. The problem centred on units made by the Japanese firm Takata and installed in millions of cars sold in America between 2000 and 2008 — or possibly even later.

Moisture could get into the airbags, causing them to inflate with far too much force in the event of an impact. If the inflation was especially violent, the airbag’s metal housing could shatter, causing fatal injuries.

As early as 2005 Takata knew that one of its airbags had exploded but did not investigate further at the time. In the event it turned out that 34m cars made by 11 companies were affected by the dodgy airbags — including more than 1m in Britain. So far, many of the faulty devices have been replaced, but many still haven’t. With so many cars affected, it could be years before the roads are cleared of cars with explosive airbags.

GM’s killer ignition switches

When you buy a car, you expect certain things from it — such as that it won’t kill you because of poor design or manufacture. Sadly for Chevrolet Cobalt buyers, that wasn’t the case.

The car was launched in 2004, and it soon became apparent that its ignition switch could fail while the car was being driven, leading to the power being cut. In the process, safety systems such as the airbags and antilock braking were deactivated. General Motors, the parent company of Chevrolet, knew about the problem around the time of the Cobalt’s launch, but did not fix it.

In 2006 GM thought it had better act, so it introduced a new ignition switch but kept the same part number so it wouldn’t be obvious that there had been a redesign. The truth was revealed by a small-town lawyer, who sued GM on behalf of the family of a woman who had died in a crash.

GM was forced to recall 2.6m Chevrolet Cobalts and Pontiac G5s (the cars were identical) and by the end of 2013 had accepted that the switches were directly responsible for 13 deaths. So far the scandal has cost GM an estimated $4.2bn.

The Saylor family died when their Lexus crashedThe Saylor family died when their Lexus crashed

Toyota/Lexus unintended acceleration

The most recent car scandal to affect British drivers centred on Toyota and its subsidiary, Lexus, which knew of a global problem with the accelerator pedals in its cars failing to work properly.

Things kicked off in 2009 when the US authorities released an audio recording of an off-duty California highway patrol officer, Mark Saylor, out of control in his Lexus at 125mph. The car crashed, killing him, his daughter, his wife and his brother-in-law. After the recording was broadcast, other drivers began to report similar problems. Toyota insisted that most incidents were the result of driver error or floor mats jamming under the pedals. Yet it was sitting on documents showing that the accelerator pedal’s design was flawed. It denied to The Sunday Times that the problem extended to Britain, but later it was forced to recall British Toyotas.

The US authorities imposed a $1.2bn fine – then the largest given to a car maker. The company was forced to recall about 9m cars around the world including 180,000 in Britain.